If you need more capabilities than I'd consider Redis and use it for all sorts of other things such as a cache. In my taste, you should go with a minialistic approach and try to avoid either of them if you can, especially if your architecture does not fall nicely into event sourcing. Kafka nowadays is much more than a distributed message broker. guidance on steps the transit agency should employ to respond to or report. But also note that Redis is not a pure message broker (at time of writing) but more of a general purpose in-memory key-value store. An acceptable method of securing transit agencies is to monitor and identify. I have a good past experience in terms of manageability/devops of the above options with Kafka and Redis, not so much with RabbitMQ. Do you need Pub/Sub or Push/Pull? Is queuing of messages enough or would you need querying or filtering of messages before consumption? Also, someone would have to manage these brokers (unless using managed, cloud provider based solution), automate their deployment, someone would need to take care of backups, clustering if needed, disaster recovery, etc. ![]() Why are you considering event-sourcing architecture using Message Brokers such as the above? Won't a simple REST service based arch suffice? Read about CQRS and the problems it entails (state vs command impedance for example). I think something is missing here and you should consider answering it to yourself. Here's a link to Kafka's open source repository on GitHub. Kafka is an open source tool with 13.1K GitHub stars and 6.99K GitHub forks. On the other hand, MassTransit provides the following key features: Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled).Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views.Some of the features offered by Kafka are: Kafka and MassTransit can be primarily classified as "Message Queue" tools. NET-based Enterprise Service Bus software that helps Microsoft developers route messages over MSMQ, RabbitMQ, TIBCO and ActiveMQ service busses, with native support for MSMQ and RabbitMQ. MassTransit is free software/open-source. On the other hand, MassTransit is detailed as " Lightweight message bus for creating distributed applications". It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design. Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. ![]() Total number of activity compensation failuresĮlapsed time spent compensating an activity, in secondsįor the metrics above, labels are specified where appropriate.Kafka vs MassTransit: What are the differences?ĭevelopers describe Kafka as " Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system". The consumer has a dependency to an interface and all I want. The consumer should store the registration request in some kind of storage. ![]() The test scenario is as follows: A consumer receives a message that tells it to handle a product registration. Total number of activity executions faultsĮlapsed time spent executing an activity, in seconds Im new to MassTransit and are currently exploring the possibility to unit test a consumer. Number of activity compensations in progress ![]() Number of activity executions in progress
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |